4.2 Article

The ethical landscape of gene drive research

期刊

BIOETHICS
卷 33, 期 9, 页码 1091-1097

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/bioe.12640

关键词

ethics; gene drives; genetic engineering; malaria; public health

资金

  1. Tata Institute for Genetics and Society
  2. Institute for Practical Ethics

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Gene drive technology has immense potential. The ability to bypass the laws of Mendelian inheritance and almost ensure the transmission of specific genetic material to future generations creates boundless possibilities. But alongside these boundless possibilities are major social and ethical issues. This article aims to introduce gene drive technology, some of its potential applications, and some of the social and ethical issues that arise during research into the technology. For example, is investigation into gene drives hubristic? Would applications of gene drives count as technological fixes? Or does research into such a technology sit on a slippery slope or lock us in to its full-scale use? Are there perverse effects of engaging in research, and, most importantly, who ought to be included in the decision-making process regarding research and field trials? Understanding the basic ethical landscape of this technology will prove invaluable to the public, scientists, and policy-makers as research moves forward.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

Article Ethics

Justifying the risks of COVID-19 challenge trials: The analogy with organ donation

Athmeya Jayaram, Jacob Sparks, Daniel Callies

Summary: The article discusses the ethical debate surrounding challenge trials in the COVID pandemic, suggesting that making an analogy to non-directed live organ donation is a valid approach. While there are differences between the two, these differences are not sufficient to argue that challenge trials are unethical.

BIOETHICS (2022)

Article Ethics

Justifying an Intentional Species Extinction: The Case of Anopheles gambiae

Daniel Edward Callies, Yasha Rohwer

Summary: This paper offers an ethical examination of intentionally eradicating the Anopheles gambiae mosquito, the main malaria vector in sub-Saharan Africa. The evaluation focuses on the benefits of alleviating the malaria burden and the loss of value associated with species eradication. The study argues that Anopheles gambiae has minor instrumental value, little final subjective value, and no objective final value.

ENVIRONMENTAL VALUES (2022)

Article Ethics

Assessing climate policies: Catastrophe avoidance and the right to sustainable development

Daniel Edward Callies, Darrel Moellendorf

Summary: This paper discusses five different climate policy routes and primarily assesses the possibility of achieving the goal of global warming below 2 degrees Celsius, relying on the moral considerations of avoiding catastrophic climate change and maintaining the right to sustainable development.

POLITICS PHILOSOPHY & ECONOMICS (2021)

Article Social Sciences, Interdisciplinary

Bednets or Biotechnology: To Rescue Current Persons or Research for the Future?

Daniel Edward Callies

FUDAN JOURNAL OF THE HUMANITIES AND SOCIAL SCIENCES (2020)

Article Ethics

The Slippery Slope Argument against Geoengineering Research

Daniel Edward Callies

JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHILOSOPHY (2019)

Article Environmental Studies

Institutional Legitimacy and Geoengineering Governance

Daniel Edward Callies

ETHICS POLICY & ENVIRONMENT (2018)

Article Environmental Studies

Solar Geoengineering and Democracy

Joshua B. Horton, Jesse L. Reynolds, Holly Jean Buck, Daniel Callies, Stefan Schaefer, David W. Keith, Steve Rayner

GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL POLITICS (2018)

暂无数据