4.5 Article

Prediction of thrombosis risk in patients with paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria

期刊

ANNALS OF HEMATOLOGY
卷 98, 期 10, 页码 2283-2291

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00277-019-03770-3

关键词

Paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria (PNH); Thrombosis; Risk score; Prediction model

资金

  1. Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences (CAMS) innovation fund for medical sciences [2016-I2M-3-004]
  2. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2016YFC0901500]
  3. Beijing Natural Science Foundation [7192168]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria (PNH) is an acquired hemolytic disease with thrombosis as a major complication. The mechanism of thrombosis and related risk factors in PNH patients are still not well characterized. We retrospectively enrolled 99 patients with newly diagnosed PNH at our institute from 2011 to 2016. According to binary logistic regression model analysis, we first identified four baseline clinical risk factors which may be associated with incidence of thrombosis in the PNH cohort, including PNH clone sizes (fluorescent aerolysin of neutrophil) <= 80 (OR 1.056, 95%CI 1.016-1.097, P = 0.005), hemoglobin <= 75 g/L (OR 4.202, 95%CI 0.984-17.954, P = 0.053), platelet > 100 x 10(9)/L (OR 6.547, 95%CI 1.490-28.767, P = 0.013) and rs495828 = G (OR 5.243, 95%CI 1.314-20.916, P = 0.019). These independent risk factors were combined together to develop a risk model to evaluate thrombosis risk (AUC = 0.756, 95%CI 0.607-0.905, P < 0.001). Our risk model revealed a higher cumulative incidence of thrombosis and an earlier thrombosis events in PNH patients with high risk (risk score >= 23) compared with those with low risk (risk score < 23, P < 0.001 and P = 0.043, respectively). Although with some limitations, we set up a prediction model for thrombosis risk in patients with PNH for the first time, but it needed to be verified in a prospective study with larger patients and longer follow-up time in the future.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据