4.8 Article

Magnesiophilic Graphitic Carbon Nanosubstrate for Highly Efficient and Fast-Rechargeable Mg Metal Batteries

期刊

ACS APPLIED MATERIALS & INTERFACES
卷 11, 期 42, 页码 38754-38761

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsami.9b13447

关键词

nanosubstrate; carbon substrate; magnesiophilic; metal anode; Mg battery

资金

  1. Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Ministry of Education [NRF-2019M3D1A2103932, NRF-2019R1A2C1084836, NRF-2018R1A4A1025169]
  2. KIST Institutional Program [2E29641]
  3. National Research Foundation of Korea [2019M3D1A2103932] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The high volumetric energy density of rechargeable Mg batteries (RMBs) gives them a competitive advantage over current Li ion batteries, which originates from the high volumetric capacity (similar to 3833 mA h cm(-3)) of bivalent Mg metal anodes (MMAs). On the other hand, despite their importance, there are few reports on research strategies to improve the electrochemical performance of MMAs. This paper reports that catalytic carbon nanosubstrates rather than metal-based substrates, such as Mo, Cu, and stainless steel, are essential in MMAs to improve the electrochemical performance of RMBs. In particular, three-dimensional macroporous graphitic carbon nanosubstrates (GC-NSs) with high electrical conductivities can accommodate Mg metal with significantly higher rate capabilities and Coulombic efficiencies than metal substrates, resulting in a more stable and longer-term cycling performance over 1000 cycles. In addition, while metal-based substrates suffered from undesirable Mg peeling-off, homogeneous Mg metal deposition is well-guided in GC-NSs owing to the better affinity of the Mg2+ ion. These results are supported by density functional theory calculations and ex-situ characterization.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据