Nomograms Predict Survival Advantages of Gleason Score 3+4 Over 4+3 for Prostate Cancer: A SEER-Based Study

Cancer statistics, 2018

(2018) Rebecca L. Siegel et al.   CA-A CANCER JOURNAL FOR CLINICIANS

Marital status independently predicts prostate cancer survival in men who underwent radical prostatectomy: An analysis of 95,846 individuals

(2018) Tian‑Bao Huang et al.   Oncology Letters

Nomograms for predicting risk of locoregional recurrence and distant metastases for esophageal cancer patients after radical esophagectomy

(2018) Wen-Yi Zhang et al.   BMC CANCER

Validation and head-to-head comparison of three nomograms predicting probability of lymph node invasion of prostate cancer in patients undergoing extended and/or sentinel lymph node dissection

(2017) Nikolaos Grivas et al.   EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING

Validation of prostate-specific antigen laboratory values recorded in Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results registries

(2016) et al.   CANCER

A Contemporary Prostate Cancer Grading System: A Validated Alternative to the Gleason Score

(2016) Jonathan I. Epstein et al.   EUROPEAN UROLOGY

NCCN Guidelines Insights: Prostate Cancer Early Detection, Version 2.2016

(2016) Peter R. Carroll et al.   Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network

External Validation of Bladder Cancer Predictive Nomograms for Recurrence, Cancer-Free Survival and Overall Survival following Radical Cystectomy

(2016) Michael Brooks et al.   JOURNAL OF UROLOGY

The 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma

(2015) Jonathan I. Epstein et al.   AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL PATHOLOGY

Nomograms to predict survival and the risk for developing local or distant recurrence in patients with rectal cancer treated with optional short-term radiotherapy

(2015) W. van Gijn et al.   ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY

Nomogram Predicting Prostate Cancer–specific Mortality for Men with Biochemical Recurrence After Radical Prostatectomy

(2015) John A. Brockman et al.   EUROPEAN UROLOGY

Oncological outcome after radical prostatectomy: Marital status does not make a difference

(2015) Jonas Schiffmann et al.   INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY

Prognostic Gleason grade grouping: data based on the modified Gleason scoring system

(2013) Phillip M. Pierorazio et al.   BJU INTERNATIONAL

Prognostic significance of primary Gleason pattern in Japanese men with Gleason score 7 prostate cancer treated with radical prostatectomy

(2012) Hideaki Miyake et al.   UROLOGIC ONCOLOGY-SEMINARS AND ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS

Clinically significant Gleason sum upgrade

(2011) Viacheslav Iremashvili et al.   CANCER

Impact of the primary Gleason pattern on biochemical recurrence-free survival after radical prostatectomy: a single-center cohort of 1,248 patients with Gleason 7 tumors

(2010) Olivier Alenda et al.   WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY

Gleason Score and Lethal Prostate Cancer: Does 3 + 4 = 4 + 3?

(2009) Jennifer R. Stark et al.   JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY