4.3 Article

Metagenomic analysis of bacterial endophyte community structure and functions in Panax ginseng at different ages

期刊

3 BIOTECH
卷 9, 期 8, 页码 -

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s13205-019-1838-x

关键词

Panax ginseng; Bacterial endophyte; Shotgun metagenomics; Siderophore

资金

  1. Cooperative Research Program for Agriculture Science & Technology Development [PJ 01312412019]
  2. Rural Development Administration, Republic of Korea
  3. National Institute of Horticultural and Herbal Science, Rural Development Administration, Republic of Korea

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigated the root-associated bacterial endophytes of Panax ginseng at different ages by shotgun metagenomic analysis. After mapping metagenome data to the complete ginseng genome to identify unmapped sequences, we predicted the structure and functions of ginseng bacterial endophytes by metagenomic rapid annotation using subsystems technology analysis. While Proteobacteria and Actinobacteria were the predominant phyla in all samples (2-6-year-old roots), class Alphaproteobacteria was most abundant in 3-, 4-, and 5-year-old plants. We found that 3-year-old P. ginseng had a 0.66% unmapped rate against the whole ginseng genome and showed the greatest diversity of endophytic bacteria (alpha diversity=299). Prediction of endophytic bacterial functions at different ages by SEED subsystem analysis revealed that siderophore and auxin-related traits-which are known to promote plant growth-were most highly represented in 3-year-old plants. This was supported by a gene frequency analysis of plant growth-promoting genes, including those responsible for solubilization of phosphate and nitrogen metabolism, using BLASTn. These results suggest that endophytic bacteria of the P. ginseng root affect plant growth. Furthermore, the isolation and purification of plant growth-promoting endophytes identified in this study could promote sustainable cultivation of ginseng in the future.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据