4.5 Article

Structural Phase Transition and Metallization of Nanocrystalline Rutile Investigated by High-Pressure Raman Spectroscopy and Electrical Conductivity

期刊

MINERALS
卷 9, 期 7, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/min9070441

关键词

nanocrystalline rutile; phase transition; metallization; high pressure; diamond anvil cell

资金

  1. strategic priority Research Program (B) of the Chinese Academy of Sciences [18010401]
  2. Key Research Program of Frontier Sciences of CAS [QYZDB-SSW-DQC009]
  3. Hundred Talents Program of CAS
  4. NSF of China [41774099, 41772042]
  5. Youth Innovation Promotion Association of CAS [2019390]
  6. Special Fund of the West Light Foundation of CAS
  7. Postdoctoral Science Foundation of China [2018M643532]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We investigate the structural, vibrational, and electrical transport properties of nanocrystalline rutile and its high-pressure polymorphs by Raman spectroscopy, and AC complex impedance spectroscopy in conjunction with the high-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM) up to similar to 25.0 GPa using the diamond anvil cell (DAC). Experimental results indicate that the structural phase transition and metallization for nanocrystalline rutile occurred with increasing pressure up to similar to 12.3 and similar to 14.5 GPa, respectively. The structural phase transition of sample at similar to 12.3 GPa is confirmed as a baddeleyite phase, which is verified by six new Raman characteristic peaks. The metallization of the baddeleyite phase is manifested by the temperature-dependent electrical conductivity measurements at similar to 14.5 GPa. However, upon decompression, the structural phase transition from the metallic baddeleyite to columbite phases at similar to 7.2 GPa is characterized by the inflexion point of the pressure coefficient and the pressure-dependent electrical conductivity. The recovered columbite phase is always retained to the atmospheric condition, which belongs to an irreversible phase transformation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据