4.0 Article

Rural-urban disparities in smoking patterns among Chinese adults: a social-ecological approach

期刊

JOURNAL OF ETHNICITY IN SUBSTANCE ABUSE
卷 20, 期 2, 页码 241-256

出版社

ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/15332640.2019.1633980

关键词

Smoking; smoking cessation; hina; social-ecological approach; China health and nutrition survey

资金

  1. National Institute for Nutrition and Health, China Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Carolina Population Center [P2C HD050924, T32 HD007168]
  2. University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
  3. NIH [R01-HD30880, DK056350, R24 HD050924, R01-HD38700]
  4. NIH Fogarty International Center [D43 TW009077, D43 TW007709]
  5. China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Ministry of Health

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The research reveals that urban residents in China have lower odds of smoking, are more likely to engage in nondaily smoking, and smoke fewer cigarettes per day compared to rural residents. However, there is no significant disparity between urban and rural areas in terms of smoking cessation duration. Efforts should be made to address the urban-rural disparity in smoking prevention.
China has a long history of smoking behavior. Currently, nearly 26% of Chinese citizens smoke daily. This research used a nationally representative database to study the urban and rural disparities on smoking patterns applying the social-ecological model. Using the 2011 China Health and Nutrition Survey, the study sample included adult participants who were at least 18 years of age (n = 12,688). A subanalysis was carried out to investigate smoking cessation duration among smoking quitters (n = 519). Multinomial logistic regression was used to examine participants' smoking status. Zero-inflated negative binomial regression was applied to investigate participants' number of cigarettes smoked per day, and multivariable logistic regression was used to examine nondaily smoking behavior. Negative binomial regression was carried out to assess the duration of smoking cessation for individuals who quit smoking. Urban residents had lower odds of reporting current smoking status (AOR [adjusted odds ratio] = 0.83, 95% CI [0.74, 0.95]) as compared to rural residents. Urban residents also had higher odds of reporting nondaily smoking status (AOR = 1.17, 95% CI [1.04, 1.32]) and smoked fewer cigarettes per day (IRR [incidence rate ratio] = 0.93, 95% CI [0.89, 0.98]) as compared to rural participants. The disparity between urban and rural areas was not observed for smoking cessation duration. Further efforts should target the disparity between urban and rural regions regarding smoking prevention.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据