4.5 Review

A Review on Recent Progress in the Aspect of Stability of Oxygen Reduction Electrocatalysts for Proton-Exchange Membrane Fuel Cell: Quantum Mechanics and Experimental Approaches

期刊

ENERGY TECHNOLOGY
卷 7, 期 9, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/ente.201900312

关键词

durability; electrocatalysts; oxygen reduction reaction; proton-exchange membrane fuel cells; quantum mechanics

资金

  1. National Research Foundation (NRF) of Korea - Korean Government [NRF-2017R1D1A1B04031539]
  2. NRF - Ministry of Science and ICT [NRF-2017R1A2B2012318, NRF-2017R1A4A1015811]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Proton-exchange membrane fuel cells (PEMFCs) have been intensively developed. Their advantages include low working temperature, high power density, and fast reaction rate. PEMFCs are considered the most promising candidates for the reliable and efficient large-scale conversion system of hydrogen in automotive engines, distributed power generation, and portable electronic applications. In time, the current use of significant amounts of precious metals as catalysts, especially for the oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) at the cathode, can limit the sustainable utilization of PEMFCs. The significant findings in studies, which combine experiments with theories, markedly improved the understanding of catalytic activity based on the interpretation of electronic configuration. For the commercialization of PEMFCs, ensuring the reliable durability of the system is an important prerequisite. However, voluminous studies on the durability of crucial materials are still insufficient. In particular, studies on improving the durability using quantum mechanics are comparatively rare relative to the studies on the nature of the activity. Therefore, the aim of this Review is to summarize the recent trends in the research on catalysts in terms of durability by combining quantum mechanics simulations with experiments to provide some insights and potential directions for the future design of stable ORR catalysts for PEMFCs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据