4.6 Article

TGFβ Programs Central Memory Differentiation in Ex Vivo-Stimulated Human T Cells

期刊

CANCER IMMUNOLOGY RESEARCH
卷 7, 期 9, 页码 1426-1439

出版社

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/2326-6066.CIR-18-0691

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Science and Engineering Research Council (NSERC) of Canada [418607-2012-RGPIN]
  2. Leukemia/Lymphoma Society of Canada (LLSC) [202379]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The adoptive transfer of ex vivo-expanded T cells is a promising approach to treat several malignancies. Several lines of evidence support that the infusion of T cells with early memory features, capable of expanding and persisting after transfer, are associated with better outcomes. We report herein that exposure to exogenous TGF beta during human T-cell stimulation ex vivo leads to the accumulation of early/central memory (Tcm) cells. Exposure to TGF beta suppressed the expression of BLIMP-1, a key orchestrator of effector T-cell differentiation, and led to the upregulation of the memory-associated transcription factor ID3. Accordingly, this was associated with an early memory transcriptional signature in both CD4(+) and CD8(+) T-cell subsets. The T cells stimulated in the presence of TGF beta expanded normally, and displayed polyfunctional features and no suppressive activity. The adoptive transfer of ex vivo-stimulated T cells into immunodeficient mice confirmed that TGF beta-conditioned cells had an enhanced capacity to persist and mediate xenogeneic graft-versushost disease, as predicted by their early T-cell memory phenotype. Chimeric antigen receptor-expressing T cells generated in the presence of exogenous TGF beta were cytotoxic and more effective at controlling tumor growth in immunodeficient animals. This work unveils a new role for TGF beta in memory T-cell differentiation and indicates that TGF beta signaling may be harnessed to program Tcm differentiation in the context of ex vivo T-cell stimulation for adoptive immunotherapy in humans.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据