4.6 Article

Biobased Polyurethane Coatings with High Biomass Content: Tailored Properties by Lignin Selection

期刊

ACS SUSTAINABLE CHEMISTRY & ENGINEERING
卷 7, 期 13, 页码 11700-11711

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acssuschemeng.9b01873

关键词

Lignin; Polyurethane; Biobased; Biomass; Coating; Vanillic acid

资金

  1. European Commission's Seventh Framework Programme for research, technological development, and demonstration [FP7-KBBE-2013-7-613802]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

New biobased polyurethane (PU) coatings with high lignin content were developed and characterized in this work. These materials were based on a alpha,omega-diisocyanate monomer (1,4-bis(4-isocyanato-2-methoxyphenoxy)butane, VA-NCO) obtained from lignin derived vanillic acid and its further cross-linking reaction with three different nonchemically modified technical lignins obtained from different pulping processes, namely, mild acetone organosolv, kraft, and soda. After determining the optimal VA-NCO/lignin mass ratio for each type of lignin, an in-depth characterization of the obtained PU coatings highlighted their high biomass content, effective cross-linking, improved thermal stability, hydrophobic character, good adhesion performance on different types of substrates, and tunable mechanical response. These properties were found to be well-correlated to the chemical-physical features of the parent lignins used (namely, molecular weight, glass transition temperature, distribution of phenylpropane subunits, and -OH content), thereby suggesting the possibility to predictively tailor the characteristics of such biobased PU coatings by lignin selection. The results of this study demonstrate that the reaction of a lignin-derived biobased diisocyanate with different chemically unmodified technical lignins represents an interesting pathway for the production of thermosetting PU coatings with a high biomass content that can find application as high-performance biobased materials alternative to traditional petroleum-based platforms.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据