4.3 Article

Exposures to Air Pollution and Noise from Multi-Modal Commuting in a Chinese City

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ijerph16142539

关键词

multi-modal commuting; traffic related air pollution; noise; personal monitoring

资金

  1. China Scholarship Council
  2. NIH National Institutes of Environmental Health Sciences [R21 ES024715, 5P30 ES007033-23]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Modern urban travel includes mixtures of transit options, which potentially impact individual pollution exposures and health. This study aims to investigate variations in traffic-related air pollution and noise levels experienced in traffic in Chengdu, China. Methods: Real-time PM2.5, black carbon ( BC), and noise levels were measured for four transportation modes ( car, bus, subway, and shared bike) on scripted routes in three types of neighborhoods ( urban core, developing neighborhood, and suburb). Each mode of transportation in each neighborhood was sampled five times in summer and winter, respectively. After quality control, mixed effect models were built for the three pollutants separately. Results: Air pollutants had much higher concentrations in winter. Urban Core had the highest PM2.5 and BC concentrations across seasons compared to the other neighborhoods. The mixed effect model indicated that car commutes were associated with lower PM2.5 ( -34.4 mu g/m(3); 95% CI: -47.5, -21.3), BC ( -2016.4 ng/m(3); 95% CI: -3383.8, -648.6), and noise ( -9.3 dBA; 95% CI: -10.5, -8.0) levels compared with other modes; subway commutes had lower PM2.5 ( -11.9 mu g/m(3); 95% CI: 47.5, -21.3), but higher BC ( 2349.6 ng/m(3); 95% CI: 978.1, 3722.1) and noise ( 3.0 dBA; 95% CI: 1.7, 4.3) levels than the other three modes of transportation. Conclusion: Personal exposure to air pollution and noise vary by season, neighborhood, and transportation modes. Exposure models accounting for environmental, meteorological, and behavioral factors, and duration of mixed mode commuting may be useful for health studies of urban traffic microenvironments.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据