4.7 Article

Experimental reduction of host Plasmodium infection load affects mosquito survival

期刊

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
卷 9, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-45143-w

关键词

-

资金

  1. Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation [CGL2012-30759, CGL2015-65055-P, PGC2018-095704-B-100]
  2. FPI grant [BES-2013-065274]
  3. 2017 Leonardo Grant for Researchers and Cultural Creators, BBVA Foundation
  4. Junta de Andalucia [P11-RNM-7038]
  5. Marie Curie Fellowship of the European Commission [747729]
  6. State Scholarship Found from the China Scholarship Council
  7. Marie Curie Actions (MSCA) [747729] Funding Source: Marie Curie Actions (MSCA)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Plasmodium transmission success depends upon the trade-off between the use of host resources to favour parasite reproduction and the negative effects on host health, which can be mediated by infection intensity. Despite its potential influence on parasite dynamics, the effects of infection intensity on both, birds and vectors, and on Plasmodium transmission success are still poorly understood. Here, we experimentally reduced the Plasmodium load in naturally infected wild house sparrows with the antimalarial primaquine to assess the effects of intensity of infection in the vertebrate hosts on Plasmodium transmission to and by mosquitoes. We monitored the survival of Culex pipiens mosquitoes throughout the development of the parasite and the infection status of the mosquitoes by analysing the head-thorax and saliva at 13 days post-exposure to birds. The proportion of mosquitoes infected by Plasmodium and the presence of Plasmodium in saliva were not associated with the medication treatment of birds. However, the experimental treatment affected vector survival with mosquitoes fed on medicated birds showing a higher survival rate than those fed on control individuals. These results provide strong experimental evidence of the impact of parasite load of vertebrate hosts on the survival probability of malaria vectors.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据