4.5 Article

Work stress, perceived social support, self-efficacy and burnout among Chinese registered nurses

期刊

JOURNAL OF NURSING MANAGEMENT
卷 27, 期 7, 页码 1445-1453

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jonm.12828

关键词

burnout; perceived social support; self-efficacy; structural equation modelling; work stress

资金

  1. Colleges and Universities' Basic Research Projects of the Educational Department of Liaoning Province [WQ2017004]
  2. Dalian Women's Research Project [2019dlfn050]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aims To establish a model and identify structural relationships between Chinese nurses' perceived social support, self-efficacy, work stress and burnout. Background The prevalence of burnout among nurses tends to be high worldwide. A better understanding of relationships between the study variables can help hospital managers apply effective programmes to reduce burnout. However, no studies have identified the structural relationships between these variables in one model, simultaneously. Methods We conducted a cross-sectional survey to complete questionnaires from 444 nurses working in three Chinese general tertiary hospitals. The proposed model was examined by structural equation modelling. Results The proposed model was partially supported by empirical data. The total effect of work stress on burnout was large. Both work stress and the perceived social support moderately and directly affected burnout. Work stress also indirectly affected burnout through perceived social support. Work stress directly influenced perceived social support and self-efficacy. Perceived social support directly affected self-efficacy. However, self-efficacy did not directly influence burnout. Conclusions This study validated a model and identified a deep understanding of structural relationships between the selected variables among Chinese nurses. Implications for Nursing Management Apart from reducing work stressors, hospital managers should utilize more social support strategies when designing intervention programmes to reduce burnout.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据