4.6 Article

Crystal Structure of the Japanese Encephalitis Virus Capsid Protein

期刊

VIRUSES-BASEL
卷 11, 期 7, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/v11070623

关键词

flavivirus; core protein; x-ray crystallography; homodimer

类别

资金

  1. Mahidol-Liverpool Stang Mongkolsuk PhD scholarship
  2. National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Protection Research Unit in Emerging and Zoonotic Infections
  3. NIHR Program [RP-PG-0108-10,048, 17/63/110]
  4. European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation program ZikaPLAN (Preparedness Latin America Network) [734584]
  5. MRC [MC_PC_15096, G116/194] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Japanese encephalitis (JE) is inflammation and swelling of the brain caused by the JE virus (JEV), a mosquito-borne member of the Flavivirus family. There are around 68,000 JE cases worldwide each year, many of which result in permanent brain damage and death. There is no specific treatment for JE. Here we present the crystal structure of the JEV capsid protein, a potential drug target, at 1.98 angstrom, and compare it to other flavivirus capsid proteins. The JEV capsid has a helical secondary structure (alpha helixes 1-4) and a similar protein fold to the dengue virus (DENV), the West Nile virus (WNV), and the Zika virus (ZIKV) capsid proteins. It forms a homodimer by antiparallel pairing with another subunit (') through alpha-helix 1-1', 2-2', and 4-4' interactions. This dimeric form is believed to be the building block of the nucleocapsid. The flexibility of the N-terminal alpha helix-1 allows the formation of closed and open conformations with possible functional importance. The basic C-terminal pairing of alpha 4-4' forms a coiled-coil-like structure, indicating possible nucleic acid binding functionality. However, a comparison with other nucleic acid interacting domains indicates that homodimerization would preclude binding. This is the first JEV capsid protein to be described and is an addition to the structural biology of the Flavivirus.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据