4.6 Article

Regulatory tolerance and octahedral factors by using vacancy in APbI3 perovskites

期刊

VACUUM
卷 164, 期 -, 页码 186-193

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.vacuum.2019.03.018

关键词

Goldschmidt tolerance factor; Octahedral factor; Double vacancy; The effective radii of ions; The first principle

资金

  1. Key Project of the Education Department of Guizhou Province, China [KY2015379]
  2. Joint Funds of Department of Science and Technology of Guizhou Province
  3. LiuPanshui Administration of Science and Technology and LiuPanshui Normal University, China [No.LH[2014]7449]
  4. Research Foundation for Advanced Talents of LiuPanshui Normal University, China [LPSSYKYJJ201404]
  5. National Science Foundation of China [11504078]
  6. Hebei Province High Education School Science and Technology Research Project, China [BJ201613]
  7. Science and Technology Fund of Hebei Agricultural University, China [LG201812]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The Goldschmidt tolerance factor and the octahedral factor are widely used to predict stable crystal structures of perovskite materials. A t value between 0.8 and 1.0, and a u value larger than 0.41 usually result in stable perovskite structures. In this study, we set the effective radii of ions of the vacancy at both Pb sites and I sites as zero, decreased the weighted average effective ion radius, and accurately controlled the Goldschmidt tolerance factor and octahedral factor by the content of Pb-sites or I-sites vacancy. Considered by ionization, the results suggest the potential existence of the undiscovered perovskites as APb(l-x)I(3) with the single cation vacancies, CsPbI3-y with y = 0-1.00 with the single anions vacancies, and double vacancies at both the Pb-sites and I-sites perovskites APb(1-z)X(3-2z) (A = Na, K, Rb, and Cs). Finally, a simulation study was performed based on first principle, and the results indicated the structural stability and the effect of the vacancy on the physical properties.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据