4.6 Review

A review of impinging jets during rocket launching

期刊

PROGRESS IN AEROSPACE SCIENCES
卷 109, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.paerosci.2019.05.007

关键词

Impinging jet; Rocket launch; Flow structure; Noise; Launch pad; Multiphase flow

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [11372028, 11721202]
  2. Aerospace Science & Technology Joint Foundation of China Aerospace Science & Technology Corporation [6141B06220405]
  3. key project of the Science & Technology on Reliability & Environmental Engineering Laboratory [614200403020517]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

During rocket launching, the engine exhaust impinges on the launch structures, such as the launch platform and the jet deflector, leading to a complex flowfield and generating strong noise. The engine exhaust impingement induces large aerothermodynamic and acoustic loads on the launch structures and the rocket, the overload of which is a potential risk to the rocket launch. Thus, it is important to predict and reduce the loads. Although the jet impingement during rocket launching has been studied extensively, the jet impingement during rocket launching is a complex phenomenon, where multiple mechanisms are coupled. In most researches, several mechanisms are studied separately or in a partially-coupled way. Still, there are a lot of issues on the jet impingement remaining to be solved, especially when quantitative relations are taken into account. In this article, several issues involved are reviewed, to present an overview on progresses and perspectives of the jet impingement research for rocket launching. It starts with a summary of the results accessed for normal and inclined jets impinging on flat plates, then the interactive mechanisms between impinging jets and the launch platform or the deflector system, together with relevant factors that affect the flowfield and noise. Additionally, discussions on the interaction of impinging jets with multiphase flows are also presented.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据