4.8 Article

Opening TRPP2 (PKD2L1) requires the transfer of gating charges

出版社

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1902917116

关键词

ion channels; biophysics; TRP channels; gating mechanisms; polycystins

资金

  1. Carl W. Gottschalk Research Scholar Grant from the American Society of Nephrology (ASN)
  2. Mayo Clinic Robert M. and Billie Kelley Pirnie Translational PKD Research Center (National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Disease [NIDDK]) [P30 DK090728]
  3. Polycystic Kidney Disease Foundation
  4. Northwestern University Center for Kidney Research and Therapeutics research grant (NU Go KIDNEY)
  5. NIDDK [R00DK106655, R56DK119709]
  6. ASN Foundation for Kidney Research

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The opening of voltage-gated ion channels is initiated by transfer of gating charges that sense the electric field across the membrane. Although transient receptor potential ion channels (TRP) are members of this family, their opening is not intrinsically linked to membrane potential, and they are generally not considered voltage gated. Here we demonstrate that TRPP2, a member of the polycystin subfamily of TRP channels encoded by the PKD2L1 gene, is an exception to this rule. TRPP2 borrows a biophysical riff from canonical voltage-gated ion channels, using 2 gating charges found in its fourth transmembrane segment (S4) to control its conductive state. Rosetta structural prediction demonstrates that the S4 undergoes similar to 3- to 5-angstrom transitional and lateral movements during depolarization, which are coupled to opening of the channel pore. Here both gating charges form state-dependent cation-p interactions within the voltage sensor domain (VSD) during membrane depolarization. Our data demonstrate that the transfer of a single gating charge per channel subunit is requisite for voltage, temperature, and osmotic swell polymodal gating of TRPP2. Taken together, we find that irrespective of stimuli, TRPP2 channel opening is dependent on activation of its VSDs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据