4.4 Article

A computational approach towards modelling dislocation transmission across phase boundaries

期刊

PHILOSOPHICAL MAGAZINE
卷 99, 期 17, 页码 2126-2151

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/14786435.2019.1612961

关键词

Dislocations; dislocation pile-ups; Peierls-Nabarro model; phase boundary; plasticity

资金

  1. Tata Steel Europe through the Materials innovation institute (M2i)
  2. Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research (NWO) under Stichting voor de Technische Wetenschappen (STW) [13358]
  3. Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research (NWO), under M2i [S22.2.1349a]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To study the nanoscopic interaction between edge dislocations and a phase boundary within a two-phase microstructure the effect of the phase contrast on the internal stress field due to the dislocations needs to be taken into account. For this purpose a 2D semi-discrete model is proposed in this paper. It consists of two distinct phases, each with its specific material properties, separated by a fully coherent and non-damaging phase boundary. Each phase is modelled as a continuum enriched with a Peierls-Nabarro (PN) dislocation region, confining dislocation motion to a discrete plane, the glide plane. In this paper, a single glide plane perpendicular to and continuous across the phase boundary is considered. Along the glide plane bulk induced shear tractions are balanced by glide plane shear tractions based on the classical PN model. The model's ability to capture dislocation obstruction at phase boundaries, dislocation pile-ups and dislocation transmission is studied. Results show that the phase contrast in material properties (e.g. elastic stiffness, glide plane properties) alone creates a barrier to the motion of dislocations from a soft to a hard phase. The proposed model accounts for the interplay between dislocations, external boundaries and phase boundary and thus represents a suitable tool for studying edge dislocation-phase boundary interaction in two-phase microstructures.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据