4.4 Article

Muscarinic M1 and M2 receptor subtypes play opposite roles in LPS-induced septic shock

期刊

PHARMACOLOGICAL REPORTS
卷 71, 期 6, 页码 1108-1114

出版社

POLISH ACAD SCIENCES INST PHARMACOLOGY
DOI: 10.1016/j.pharep.2019.06.005

关键词

Cholinergic anti-inflammatory pathway; Muscarinic cholinergic receptor; Sepsis; Inflammation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: To compare pharmacologic effects of pirenzepine and AF-DX116, a selective competitive antagonist for M1 and M2 subtype muscarinic cholinergic receptors (mAChRs), respectively, with atropine, a non-selective competitive antagonist for mAChRs, on Lipopolysaccharide (LPS). Methods: Male C57BL/6 mice were used to establish models of LPS-induced experimental endotoxemia. Mice were intraperitoneally injected 10 min prior to LPS injection with control (saline), atropine, pirenzepine and AF-DX116, respectively. Overall survival time was estimated using Kaplan-Meier plots. Inflammatory cytokine tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) was monitored at various intervals after LPS injection and individual reagent administration. Pathological alternations in lungs and liver were analyzed. Results: Pirenzepine and atropine pretreatment improved survival rate of LPS-induced septic shock; in contrast, AF-DX116 accelerated death from sepsis. Moreover, TNF-alpha plasma level was decreased in response to pirenzepine or atropine, whereas increased in response to AF-DX116. Pirenzepine and atropine relieved whereas AF-DX116 accelerated LPS-induced pulmonary and hepatic injury. Pirenzepine reduced proportion of M1 subtype of macrophages, while AF-DX116 promoted polarization of macrophages to M1 subtype. Pirenzepine pretreatment reduced while AF-DX116 enhanced expression of SOCS3 at mRNA level. Conclusions: The administration of pirenzepine and atropine may have beneficial effects on septic shock. (C) 2019 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据