4.6 Article

Adiabatic and high-fidelity quantum gates with hybrid Rydberg-Rydberg interactions

期刊

OPTICS EXPRESS
卷 27, 期 16, 页码 23080-23094

出版社

OPTICAL SOC AMER
DOI: 10.1364/OE.27.023080

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [11474094, 11604086, 11104076]
  2. Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality [18ZR1412800]
  3. ECNU Academic Innovation Promotion Program for Excellent Doctoral Students [YBNLTS2019-023]
  4. Specialized Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education [20110076120004]
  5. Foundation of Henan Educational Committee (China) [01026631082, 14A140032]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Rydberg blockaded gate is a fundamental ingredient for scalable quantum computation with neutral Rydberg atoms. However the fidelity of such a gate is intrinsically limited by a blockade error coming from a Rydberg level shift that forbids its extensive use. Based on a dark-state adiabatic passage, we develop a novel protocol for realizing a two-atom blockade-error-free quantum gate in a hybrid system with simultaneous van der Waals (vdWsI) and resonant dipole-dipole interactions (DDI). The basic idea relies on converting the roles of two interactions, which is, the DDI serves as one time-dependent tunable pulse and the vdWsI acts as a negligible middle level shift, as long as the adiabatic condition is preserved. We adopt an optimized super-Gaussian optical pulse with k pi (k >> 1) area accompanied by a smooth tuning for the DDI, composing a circular stimulated Raman adiabatic passage, which can robustly ensure a faster operation time similar to 80ns as well as a highly-efficient gate fidelity similar to 0.9996. This theoretical protocol offers a flexible treatment for hybrid interactions in complex Rydberg systems, enabling on-demand design of new types of effective Rydberg quantum gate devices. (C) 2019 Optical Society of America under the terms of the OSA Open Access Publishing Agreement

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据