4.8 Article

Giant thermal Hall conductivity in the pseudogap phase of cuprate superconductors

期刊

NATURE
卷 571, 期 7765, 页码 376-+

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41586-019-1375-0

关键词

-

资金

  1. Canadian Institute for Advanced Research (CIFAR)
  2. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC)
  3. Fonds de recherche du Quebec-Nature et Technologies (FRQNT)
  4. Canada Foundation for Innovation (CFI)
  5. Canada Research Chair
  6. Canada First Research Excellence Fund
  7. Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation's EPiQS Initiative [GBMF5306]
  8. NSF MRSEC in the US [DMR-1720595]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The nature of the pseudogap phase of the copper oxides ('cuprates') remains a puzzle. Although there are indications that this phase breaks various symmetries, there is no consensus on its fundamental nature(1). Fermi-surface, transport and thermodynamic signatures of the pseudogap phase are reminiscent of a transition into a phase with antiferromagnetic order, but evidence for an associated long-range magnetic order is still lacking(2). Here we report measurements of the thermal Hall conductivity (in the x-y plane, kappa(xy)) in the normal state of four different cuprates-La1.6-xNd0.4SrxCuO4, La1.8-xEu0.2SrxCuO4, La2-xSrxCuO4 and Bi2Sr2-xLaxCuO6+delta. We show that a large negative kappa(xy) signal is a property of the pseudogap phase, appearing at its critical hole doping, p*. It is also a property of the Mott insulator at p approximate to 0, where kappa(xy) has the largest reported magnitude of any insulator so far(3). Because this negative kappa(xy) signal grows as the system becomes increasingly insulating electrically, it cannot be attributed to conventional mobile charge carriers. Nor is it due to magnons, because it exists in the absence of magnetic order. Our observation is reminiscent of the thermal Hall conductivity of insulators with spin-liquid states(4-6), pointing to neutral excitations with spin chirality(7) in the pseudogap phase of cuprates.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据