4.5 Article

Non-equivalence in old- and new-flagellum daughter cells of a proliferative division in Trypanosoma brucei

期刊

MOLECULAR MICROBIOLOGY
卷 112, 期 3, 页码 1024-1040

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/mmi.14345

关键词

-

资金

  1. Wellcome Trust [104627/Z/14/Z, 211075/Z/18/Z, 103261/Z/13/Z]
  2. BBSRC [BB/M000532/1]
  3. Czech Science Foundation (GA CR) Junior Project [16-26444Y]
  4. European Molecular Biology Organization
  5. Faculty of Science, Charles University, Prague
  6. Wellcome Trust [103261/Z/13/Z, 211075/Z/18/Z] Funding Source: Wellcome Trust
  7. BBSRC [BB/M000532/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Differentiation of Trypanosoma brucei, a flagellated protozoan parasite, between life cycle stages typically occurs through an asymmetric cell division process, producing two morphologically distinct daughter cells. Conversely, proliferative cell divisions produce two daughter cells, which look similar but are not identical. To examine in detail differences between the daughter cells of a proliferative division of procyclic T. brucei we used the recently identified constituents of the flagella connector. These segregate asymmetrically during cytokinesis allowing the new-flagellum and the old-flagellum daughters to be distinguished. We discovered that there are distinct morphological differences between the two daughters, with the new-flagellum daughter in particular re-modelling rapidly and extensively in early G1. This re-modelling process involves an increase in cell body, flagellum and flagellum attachment zone length and is accompanied by architectural changes to the anterior cell end. The old-flagellum daughter undergoes a different G1 re-modelling, however, despite this there was no difference in G1 duration of their respective cell cycles. This work demonstrates that the two daughters of a proliferative division of T. brucei are non-equivalent and enables more refined morphological analysis of mutant phenotypes. We suggest all proliferative divisions in T. brucei and related organisms will involve non-equivalence.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据