4.7 Article

One-pot synthesis of BiOCl half-shells using microemulsion droplets as templates with highly photocatalytic performance for the degradation of ciprofloxacin

期刊

APPLIED SURFACE SCIENCE
卷 389, 期 -, 页码 742-750

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2016.07.178

关键词

Ultrathin BiOCl half-shells; Ionic liquid microemulsion; Ciprofloxacin; Photocatalysis; Photocurrent response

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51578279, 51278242, 21307081]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Ultrathin BiOCl half-shells have been synthesized via an ionic liquid-in-water (IL/W) microemulsion, applying the liquid-liquid boundary of the emulsion system as a template. Surfactant TX-100 acted as the stabilizer of the IL-microemulsion, which is of critical importance for the formation of BiOCl half-shells. The hollow structures were characterized using X-ray diffraction, scanning and transmission electron microscopy, diffuse reflectance spectroscopy and specific surface area, respectively. Possible formation mechanisms for the BiOCl half-shells were discussed. Moreover, the ultrathin BiOCl half-shells exhibited distinctly enhanced photocatalytic efficiency toward the degradation of colourless ciprofloxacin (CIP, a representative broad-spectrum antibiotic agent) under solar light irradiation as compared to BiOCl nanosheets. The photogenerated reactive species are verified by scavenger experiments, which reveals that O-center dot(2)- and h(+) were the two major photoactive species toward the photodegradation of CIP over ultra thin BiOCl half-shells under solar-light. The enhanced activities of ultrathin BiOCl half-shells were mainly ascribed to the synergistic effect of the increased light-harvesting, larger BET surface area, faster separation and transfer of electron-hole pairs. It is hoped that the ionic liquid microemulsion-mediated route can be extended to the purposive design and fabrication of other halogen-containing inorganic hollow materials. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据