4.2 Article

(Ultra) Fine particle concentrations and exposure in different indoor and outdoor microenvironments during physical exercising

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/15287394.2019.1636494

关键词

Air pollution; ultrafine particles (UFP); physical activity; indoor; outdoor

资金

  1. Laboratory for Process Engineering, Environment, Biotechnology and Energy -LEPABE [UID/EQU/00511/2019]
  2. Associate Laboratory Research Unit for Green Chemistry - Technologies and Processes Clean - LAQV - national funds through FCT/MCTES (PIDDAC) [UID/QUI/50006/2019]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Although regular exercise improves overall well-being, increased physical activity results in enhanced breathing which consequently leads to elevated exposure to a variety of air pollutants producing adverse effects. It is well-known that one of these ambient air contaminants is ultrafine particles (UFP). Thus, this study aimed to (1) examine exposure to particle number concentrations (PNC) in size ranging from N20-1000 nm in different sport environments and (2) estimate the respective inhalation doses across varying activity scenarios based upon the World Health Organization recommendations for physical activity. PNC were continuously monitored (TSI P-Trak (TM) condensation particle counter) outdoors (Out1-Out2) and indoors (Ind1-Ind2; fitness clubs) over 4 weeks. Outdoor PNC (total median 12 563 # cm(-3); means of 20 367 # cm(-3) at Out1 and 7 122 # cm(-3) at Out2) were approximately 1.6-fold higher than indoors (total median 7 653 # cm(-3); means of 11 861 # cm(-3) at Ind1 and 14 200 # cm(-3) at Ind2). The lowest doses were inhaled during holistic group classes (7.91 x 10(7)-1.87 x 10(8) # per kg body weight) whereas exercising with mixed cardio and strength training led to approximately 1.8-fold higher levels. In order to optimize the health benefit of exercises, environmental characteristics of the locations at which physical activities are conducted need to be considered.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据