4.8 Article

Noncovalent Interactions Drive the Efficiency of Molybdenum Imido Alkylidene Catalysts for Olefin Metathesis

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY
卷 141, 期 27, 页码 10788-10800

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jacs.9b04367

关键词

-

资金

  1. Scientific Equipment Program of ETH Zurich
  2. SNSF (R'Equip grant) [206021_150709/1]
  3. Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de Sao Paulo (FAPESP) [17/13306-1, 15/08541-6, 14/50249-8]
  4. National Research Fund, Luxembourg (AFR Individual Ph.D. Grant) [12516655]
  5. National Science Foundation [CHE-1763436]
  6. Center for High Performance Computing at the University of Utah
  7. Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de Sao Paulo (FAPESP) [15/08541-6] Funding Source: FAPESP

向作者/读者索取更多资源

High-throughput experimentation and multivariate modeling allow identification of noncovalent interactions (NCIs) in monoaryloxy-pyrrolide Mo imido alkylidene metathesis catalysts prepared in situ as a key driver for high activity in a representative metathesis reaction (homodimerization of 1-nonene). Statistical univariate and multivariate modeling categorizes catalytic data from 35 phenolic ligands into two groups, depending on the substitution in the ortho position of the phenol ligand. The catalytic activity descriptor TON1h correlates predominantly with attractive NCIs when phenols bear ortho aryl substituents and, conversely, with repulsive NCIs when the phenol has no aryl ortho substituents. Energetic span analysis is deployed to relate the observed NCI and the cycloreversion metathesis step such that aryloxide ligands with no ortho aryls mainly impact the energy of metallacyclobutane intermediates (SP/TBP isomers), whereas aryloxides with pendant ortho aryls influence the transition state energy for the cycloreversion step. While the electronic effects from the aryloxide ligands also play a role, our work outlines how NCIs may be exploited for the design of improved d(0) metathesis catalysts.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据