4.7 Article

Regioselectivity in Diels-Alder Cycloadditions of #6094C68 Fullerene with a Triplet Ground State

期刊

JOURNAL OF ORGANIC CHEMISTRY
卷 84, 期 14, 页码 9017-9024

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.joc.9b00921

关键词

-

资金

  1. Spanish Ministerio de Economia y Competitividad (MINECO) [CTQ2016-78205-P, CTQ2016-81797-REDC, CTQ2017-85341-P]
  2. FEDER [CTQ2016-78205-P, CTQ2016-81797-REDC, CTQ2017-85341-P, UNGI10-4E-801]
  3. Catalan DIUE [2017SGR39]
  4. MINECO
  5. European Social Fund (ESF)
  6. Catalan DIUE (ICREA Academia 2014 prize)
  7. Catalan DIUE (XRQTC)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To achieve full control on the regioselectivity of chemical additions to fullerenes is a major goal in the field of reactivity of carbon nanostructures. In this work, we computationally analyze the regioselectivity of the Diels-Alder (DA) reaction of cyclopentadiene to the hollow nonisolated pentagon rule (IPR) C-#6094(68) fullerene, which possesses a triplet ground state. Our aim is to check whether the typically favored [6,6]-addition in fullerenes can be shifted to the [5,6] bonds in C-#6094(68) due to the change in the ground state. Our results show that the [5,5] adduct is the thermodynamic reaction product, whereas the kinetic product is the [5,6] bond of type F, adjacent to a pentalene unit. As compared to the singlet state, in the triplet state, the Gibbs barrier for the attack to the [5,6] bond of C-#6094(68) is reduced by about 5 kcal.mol(-1), the DA cycloaddition becoming more regioselective. Our energy decomposition analysis shows that the change of regioselectivity in the DA reaction of hollow fullerenes from the usual [6,6] bond to the [5,6] bond in C-#6094(68) is driven by higher stabilizing orbital interactions in the latter bond favored by the spin density accumulation around the two pentalene units of the cage. The findings of this investigation complement those of earlier studies on regioselectivity of IPR fullerenes and endohedral metallofullerenes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据