4.7 Article

A feature selection method based on modified binary coded ant colony optimization algorithm

期刊

APPLIED SOFT COMPUTING
卷 49, 期 -, 页码 248-258

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.asoc.2016.08.011

关键词

Feature selection; Genetic algorithm; Modified binary coded ant colony optimization; Visibility density model; Pheromone density model

资金

  1. 863 High Technology Program of China [2013AA122104]
  2. National Science & Technology Pillar Program [2014BAL05B07]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41301371]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Feature selection is a significant task for data mining and pattern recognition. It aims to select the optimal feature subset with the minimum redundancy and the maximum discriminating ability. In the paper, a feature selection approach based on a modified binary coded ant colony optimization algorithm (MBACO) combined with genetic algorithm (GA) is proposed. The method comprises two models, which are the visibility density model (VMBACO) and the pheromone density model (PMBACO). In VMBACO, the solution obtained by GA is used as visibility information; on the other hand, in PMBACO, the solution obtained by GA is used as initial pheromone information. In the method, each feature is treated as a binary bit and each bit has two orientations, one is for selecting the feature and another is for deselecting. The proposed method is also compared with that of GA, binary coded ant colony optimization (BACO), advanced BACO (ABACO), binary coded particle swarm optimization (BPSO), binary coded differential evolution (BDE) and a hybrid GA-ACO algorithm on some well-known UCI datasets; furthermore, it is also compared with some other existing techniques such as minimum Redundancy Maximum Relevance (mRMR), Relief algorithm for a comprehensive comparison. Experimental results display that the proposed method is robust, adaptive and exhibits the better performance than other methods involved in the paper. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据