4.6 Article

Residential wood stove use and indoor exposure to PM2.5 and its components in Northern New England

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41370-019-0151-4

关键词

Indoor air pollution; Wood stove use; PM2; 5; Black carbon; Organic carbon; Trace elements

资金

  1. NIEHS NIH HHS [R01 ES019853, P01 ES022832, K23 ES024803, R01 ES030101, P42 ES007373] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIGMS NIH HHS [P20 GM104416] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NIH HHS [UH3 OD023275] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background Residential wood stove use has become more prevalent in high-income countries, but only limited data exist on indoor exposure to PM2.5 and its components. Methods From 2014 to 2016, we collected 7-day indoor air samples in 137 homes of pregnant women in Northern New England, using a micro-environmental monitor. We examined associations of wood stove use with PM2.5 mass and its components [black carbon (BC), organic and elemental carbon and their fractions, and trace elements], adjusted for sampling season, community wood stove use, and indoor activities. We examined impact of stove age, EPA-certification, and wood moisture on indoor pollutants. Results Median (IQR) household PM2.5 was 6.65 (5.02) mu g/m(3) and BC was 0.23 (0.20) mu g/m(3). Thirty percent of homes used a wood stove during monitoring. In homes with versus without a stove, PM2.5 was 20.6% higher [although 95% confidence intervals (-10.6, 62.6) included the null] and BC was 61.5% higher (95% CI: 11.6, 133.6). Elemental carbon (total and fractions 3 and 4), potassium, calcium, and chloride were also higher in homes with a stove. Older stoves, non-EPA-certified stoves, and wet or mixed (versus dry) wood were associated with higher pollutant concentrations, especially BC. Conclusions Homes with wood stoves, particularly those that were older and non-EPA-certified or burning wet wood had higher concentrations of indoor air combustion-related pollutants.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据