4.6 Article

A liquid chromatography detector based on continuous-flow chemical vapor generation coupled glow discharge atomic emission spectrometry: Determination of organotin compounds in food samples

期刊

JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A
卷 1608, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2019.460406

关键词

Chemical vapor generation; Glow discharge; Atomic emission spectrometry; Liquid chromatography; Organotins

资金

  1. National Science and Technology Major Project of the Ministry of Science and Technology of China [16YFD0201203]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21607171]
  3. earmarked fund for China Agriculture Research System [CARS-31]
  4. Central Public-interest Scientific Institution Basal Research Fund for Chinese Academy of Tropical Agricultural Sciences [1630082017005, 1630082019001]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A novel liquid chromatography (LC) detector based on continuous-flow chemical vapor generation (CVG)-coupled glow discharge (GD) atomic emission spectrometry (AES) was proposed herein for the simultaneous determination of organotins (OTs) in food samples. OTs were separated on an LC column and converted into volatile gases by the CVG technique. The GD microplasma was used to excite the Sn atoms to generate the special atomic emission lines of Sn at 317.66 nm, which were recorded by a charge-coupled device (CCD) spectrometer. For an injection volume of 1 mL, the linear correlation coefficients (R) were higher than 0.99 in the concentration range from 0.1 to 10 mu g mL(-1). The recoveries of OTs from spiked samples were 70-103%, and the relative standard deviations (RSD) were 0.2-8.7%. The limits of detection (LOD) for the tested OTs, i.e. trimethyltin chloride (TMT) and dimethyltin dichloride (DMTC), were determined to be 0.59 and 0.93 mu g L-1, respectively. The CVG-GD-AES detector can be used to simultaneously determine TMT and DMTC with high sensitivity, in a simple and cost-effective manner. (C) 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据