4.6 Article

Exploring service positioning in platform-based markets

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2019.07.028

关键词

O2O platforms; Cinema industry; Game theory; Hotelling model; Panel-data model

资金

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [71671081, 71331004]
  3. National Social Science Foundation of China [17BGL200]
  4. Humanities and Social Science Project of Ministry of Education [15YJA630065]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Online to offline (O2O) platforms have been widely used in practice, enabling consumers to search for information and purchase products or services online and then consume offline. Service differentiation, however, becomes a critical issue for competing firms when they join an O2O platform. This paper examines the impact of an O2O platform in the cinema industry by developing a general duopoly competition model. We find that after joining an O2O platform, competing cinemas should differentiate themselves less as either of two factors increases: the total market size or the proportion of audience members preferring movie ticketing services through the O2O platform. Based on analytical results from the model, we further develop hypotheses in the context of China's cinema industry, where O2O platforms play a major role in cinemas' total revenue. In order to further define the practical implications of the theoretical analysis, we conduct an empirical study, using real data collected from the Chinese cinema industry to demonstrate the impact of two major factors on service differentiation between cinemas that have joined O2O platforms. To align our empirical research with the Hotelling setting in the analytical model, five pairs of cinemas are selected using the partition clustering approach. We employ panel-data empirical models to test our hypotheses and conduct robustness checks. The findings confirm hypotheses regarding service differentiation in platform-based markets. Implications and insights are also discussed in this paper.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据