4.7 Article

Fuel processor-battery-fuel cell hybrid drivetrain for extended range operation of passenger vehicles

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY
卷 44, 期 29, 页码 15494-15510

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.04.081

关键词

Hybrid fuel cell electric vehicles; Fuel processors; On-board hydrogen generation; Batteries; Driving cycles; Range

资金

  1. National Centre for Combustion Research and Development (NCCRD), IIT Madras, Chennai - Department of Science and Technology, Government of India [IR/S3/EU-01/2009]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Power required to run auxiliary systems on a passenger car, such as those for air conditioning and advanced vehicle control, reduces the driving range of a vehicle equipped with a hybrid drive train. Under practical driving conditions, a significant amount of additional energy is required at low power levels compared to the rated power of the drive unit. In the present study, we consider a fuel cell-battery drive train augmented by an on-board fuel (ethanol) processor to provide the motoring power requirements of a car. Using systematic driving cycle simulations that take account of power-to-weight, energy-to-weight and power-to-efficiency factors of on-board power sources under simulated load conditions, we show that a combination of steadily-operated compact ethanol reformer, a low-power battery continuously charged by excess reformer capacity and a high-power fuel cell powered by conservatively-used hydrogen from cylinder can increase the range of hybrid fuel cell drivetrains to about 750 km. Although the overall energy consumption of the three-way hybrid is more than that of fuel cell-battery hybrid, lesser use of stored hydrogen improves the fuel economy of the hybrid drivetrain. While the system complexity is increased, long-range distressed mode operation becomes feasible with the added fuel processor. (C) 2019 Hydrogen Energy Publications LLC. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据