4.7 Article

Carboxymethylcellulose/pectin inhibiting structural folding of rice proteins via trinary structural interplays

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.04.091

关键词

Rice proteins; Polysaccharides; Structural interactions

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China, China [31771898]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province, China [BK20180614]
  3. National First-class Discipline Program of Food Science and Technology, China [JUFSTR20180203]
  4. Foundation of Scientific Development of Wuxi, China [WX18IIAN505]
  5. Scientific Plan for Jiangsu Province, China [BE2018309]
  6. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities of China [JUSRP11809]
  7. Special Fund for Grain Scientific Research in the Public Interest of China, China [201513006]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Developing food components combining materials properties from both proteins and polysaccharides is an intriguing as well as challenging task in food industry. In the present study, we report that by mixing rice proteins (RPs) with carboxymethylcellulose (CMC) and pectin at pH 12 prior to neutralization, trinary complexes dispersible in water were formed. Fluorescence, ultraviolet, and circular dichroism spectra revealed that the RPs in the resultant composites remained partially unfolded as a result of interactions with both polysaccharides. Bearing exposed interiors from RPs and hydrophilic moieties from polysaccharides, the trinary composites were quite stable against aggregation as indicated by improved surface charges and weakened hydrophobicity. Additionally, by tuning the RP:polysaccharide ratios, we obtained nanoscale discs or interlinked ribbons, indicating their potential applications in emulsions or films, respectively. Based on our strategy, the trinary complexes consisting of multi -components can find applications in the futuristic design of functional ingredients in food and numerous other areas. (C) 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据