4.7 Article

Carbon and sulfur isotopes in tree rings as a proxy for volcanic degassing

期刊

GEOLOGY
卷 47, 期 9, 页码 825-828

出版社

GEOLOGICAL SOC AMER, INC
DOI: 10.1130/G46323.1

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (NSERC) of Canada
  2. Geotop Research Centre on the Dynamics of the Earth System
  3. Multidisci plinary Applied Geochemistry Network
  4. NSERC
  5. Deep Carbon Observatory's Biology Meets Subduction project
  6. Deep Carbon Observatory's DECADE project
  7. Costa Rican Ley Transitorio 8933
  8. U.S. Geological Survey Volcano Disaster Assistance Program (VDAP)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Trees are useful archives of past atmospheric conditions. They have most commonly been used to infer large-scale changes in climate, industrial pollution, and the magnitude and frequency of geological hazards. While geochemical changes in tree rings have been linked to localized anthropogenic smelter pollution, their potential to track geochemical changes in volcanic degassing has not yet been fully realized. Here, we applied a new proxy using sulfur and carbon isotopes in tree rings to examine fluctuations in gas emission at Turrialba volcano, Costa Rica. Since 2009,Turrialba has emitted a persistent gas plume and increasingly frequent explosions and ash eruptions as activity has accelerated. We collected cores from a species of alder tree, Alnus acuminata, at several locations surrounding the volcano. Biannual isotopic analysis of rings demonstrated a notable delta S-34 shift of -5.2%, and a similarly sharp delta C-13 shift of +1.3%. in trees downwind of the plume following the onset of strong degassing in 2009. We propose that these shifts in the isotopic values of the tree correspond to those of the volcanic SO2 and CO2 and in the case of the delta C-13, an additional fractionation caused by leaf impairment from exposure to volcanic SO2. This new proxy can be applied to other volcanoes as a novel method of obtaining a temporal record of degassing, a crucial tool for volcano monitoring.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据