4.8 Article

Small-Sized Microplastics Negatively Affect Rotifers: Changes in the Key Life-History Traits and Rotifer-Phaeocystis Population Dynamics

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
卷 53, 期 15, 页码 9241-9251

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.9b02893

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31730105]
  2. Topic Selection of Excellent Doctoral Dissertations of Nanjing Normal University [18120000063114]
  3. Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Most coastal waters are at risk from microplastics, which vary in concentration and size. Rotifers, as important primary consumers linking primary producers and higher trophic consumers, usually coexist with the harmful alga Phaeocystis and microplastics in coastal waters; this coexistence may interfere with rotifer life-history traits and ingestion of Phaeocystis. To evaluate the effects of microplastics on rotifers, we designed a series of experiments concerning rotifer Brachionus plicatilis life-history traits and rotifer-Phaeocystis (predator-prey) population dynamics under different concentrations and sizes of microplastics. The results showed that small-sized microplastics (0.07 mu m) at high levels (>= 5 mu g mL(-1)) decreased rotifer survival and reproduction, prolonged the time to maturation, and reduced the body size at maturation, whereas large-sized microplastics (0.7 and 7 mu m) had no effect on rotifer life-history traits. For rotifer-Phaeocystis population levels, small-sized microplastics (0.07 mu m) significantly delayed the elimination of Phaeocystis by rotifers; this is the first study to test the effects of microplastics on predator-prey dynamics. The results of rotifer-Phaeocystis population dynamics are consistent with the changes in the life-history traits of rotifers and further confirm the negative effects of small-sized microplastics (0.07 mu m) on rotifers. These findings help to reveal the effect of pollutants on predator-prey population dynamics.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据