4.7 Article

Object-oriented modeling of thoracic fluid balance to study cardiogenic pulmonary congestion in humans

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2019.104998

关键词

Cardiogenic congestion; Object-oriented modeling; Cardiopulmonary interaction; Matlab Simscape; Fluid balance; Starling equation; Lymphatic system

资金

  1. Philips GmbH Innovative Technologies, Aachen, Germany

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background and objective: We hypothesized that a biophysical computational model implemented in an object-oriented modeling language (OOML) would provide physiological information and simulative data to study the development and treatment of cardiogenic pulmonary congestion. Methods: This work is based on the object-oriented cardiopulmonary interaction introduced in [1]. This paper describes the novel model components required to study cardiogenic pulmonary congestion: i) interstitial fluid exchange related to the Starling equation, ii) the lymphatic pump, and iii) the interconnection of these elements with the original cardiopulmonary model. The presented model succeeds in i) describing lymphatic flow at the capillary artery and venous end, ii) activation of the lymphatic pump at elevated pulmonary pressures, and iii) the simulation of the different safety factors related to lung tissue, osmotic gradient, and the lymphatic system during the development of lung congestion. Results: Simulations show a qualitative correlation between model behavior and physiological data from literature. The model also demonstrates the beneficial effect of continuous positive airway pressure therapy on fluid clearance and respiratory mechanics. Conclusion: This study demonstrates the successful use of OOML to describe the development of cardiogenic congestion by introducing a model of the lymphatic system and the thoracic fluid balance system, as well as connecting them to the existing cardiopulmonary model. (C) 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据