4.5 Article

Enhanced Natamycin production by Streptomyces natalensis in shake-flasks and stirred tank bioreactor under batch and fed-batch conditions

期刊

BMC BIOTECHNOLOGY
卷 19, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12896-019-0546-2

关键词

Natamycin; Catabolite repression; Degradation; Streptomyces natalensis; Feeding; Bioreactor

资金

  1. Deanship of Scientific Research, King Saud University through Vice Deanship of Scientific Research Chairs

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BackgroundNatamycin is an antifungal polyene macrolide antibiotic with wide applications in health and food industries. Currently, it is the only antifungal food additive with the GRAS status (Generally Regarded as Safe).ResultsNatamycin production was investigated under the effect of different initial glucose concentrations. Maximal antibiotic production (1.580.032g/L) was achieved at 20g/L glucose. Under glucose limitation, natamycin production was retarded and the produced antibiotic was degraded. Higher glucose concentrations resulted in carbon catabolite repression. Secondly, intermittent feeding of glucose improved natamycin production due to overcoming glucose catabolite regulation, and moreover it was superior to glucose-beef mixture feeding, which overcomes catabolite regulation, but increased cell growth on the expense of natamycin production. Finally, the process was optimized in 7.5L stirred tank bioreactor under batch and fed-batch conditions. Continuous glucose feeding for 30h increased volumetric natamycin production by about 1.6- and 1.72-folds in than the batch cultivation in bioreactor and shake-flasks, respectively.ConclusionsGlucose is a crucial substrate that significantly affects the production of natamycin, and its slow feeding is recommended to alleviate the effects of carbon catabolite regulation as well as to prevent product degradation under carbon source limitation. Cultivation in bioreactor under glucose feeding increased maximal volumetric enzyme production by about 72% from the initial starting conditions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据