4.8 Article

Real-time estimation of battery state-of-charge with unscented Kalman filter and RTOS μCOS-II platform

期刊

APPLIED ENERGY
卷 162, 期 -, 页码 1410-1418

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.01.120

关键词

Electric vehicles; SoC estimation; Unscented Kalman filter; Battery management system; Battery-in-the-loop

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51276022]
  2. National Science & Technology Pillar Program [2013BAG05B00]
  3. Program for New Century Excellent Talents in University of China [NCET-11-0785]
  4. Beijing Institute of Technology Research Fund Program for Young Scholars

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To develop an advanced battery estimation unit for electric vehicles application, the state-of-charge (SoC) estimation is proposed with an unscented Kalman filter (UKF) and realized with the RTOS mu COS-II platform. Kalman filters are broadly used to deploy various battery SoC estimators recently. Herein, an UKF algorithm has been employed to develop a systematic adaptive SoC estimation framework. Compared with traditional used extended Kalman filter, it uses an unscented transform to deal with the state estimation problem, thus it has the potential to achieve third order accuracy of the Taylor expansion for tracking posterior estimate of the inner inhabited state. Beneficial from it, the SoC estimation accuracy has been improved with higher tracking accuracy and faster convergence ability. To further evaluate and verify the performance of the proposed online SoC estimation approach, a battery-in-loop platform is built and the SoC estimation is calculated with a RTOS mu LCOS-II platform. The analog acquisition, communication system and SoC estimation algorithms were programmed, the performance of the proposed SoC estimation with UKF algorithm was finally investigated. The battery management system with UKF algorithm and RTOS mu COS-II platform has good performance and it can apply for electric vehicles. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据