4.8 Article

In-plane nonuniform temperature effects on the performance of a large-format lithium-ion pouch cell

期刊

APPLIED ENERGY
卷 165, 期 -, 页码 639-647

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.11.090

关键词

Battery thermal management system; Pouch cell nonuniform temperature effects; Side-cooling; Large format; Lithium ion

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Due to the temperature sensitive behavior of lithium-ion batteries a thermal management system (TMS) is typically integrated into the battery pack design. This system plays a crucial role in the total battery pack performance. During operation the TMS will induce nonuniform temperature distributions within the cells of the pack, due to relatively low cell thermal conductivity. However, limited research has been published regarding the effects of thermal nonuniformity throughout a cell, module, or pack. Understanding these effects will be beneficial to heat exchanger design and TMS control strategy optimization. Here, an experimental investigation is performed where fixed one-dimensional temperature distributions, emulating the effects of edge-based heat transfer, are applied across the face of a 10Ah NiCoMn Li-ion pouch cell. Average cell temperature conditions of 15, 25, and 35 degrees C with edge-to-edge temperature differences (Delta T) of 0, 5, 10, and 20 degrees C are applied. At each thermal treatment the effects on: (1) the pulse resistance at 50% state of charge, (2) the bulk resistance on a Charge-Depleting US06 power, profile, and (3) the overpotential during Constant-Current charge are investigated. Pulse resistance is decreased with increased Delta T. However, the discharge resistance on the Charge-Depleting cycle was increased with increased Delta T. The Constant-Current charging overpotential (and therefore resistance) was also increased with increased Delta T. All effects are largest at 15 degrees C, and negligible at 35 degrees C. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据