4.7 Article

Modes decomposition method in fusion with robust random vector functional link network for crude oil price forecasting

期刊

APPLIED SOFT COMPUTING
卷 80, 期 -, 页码 475-493

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.asoc.2019.04.026

关键词

Crude oil price forecasting; Robust random vector functional link network; Variational mode decomposition; Extreme learning machine; Least squares support vector machine

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper proposes a decomposition based method in fusion with the non-iterative approach for crude oil price forecasting. In this approach, the robust random vector functional link network (RVFLN), a non-iterative approach in fusion with the most efficient decomposition technique called variational mode decomposition (VMD) is proposed which is executed with two links - fixed assigned random weights and direct link from input to output, and the iterative learning process is not involved in its functioning which makes it faster in execution as compared to many existing techniques proposed for forecasting. The fusion of VMD and robust RVFLN called VMD-RVFLN is implemented for crude oil price forecasting where the crude oil price series is decomposed using VMD into a linear smoother series by extracting useful information and the decomposed modes pass through the robust RVFLN model which produces the final forecasting values. The analysis performed in the study approves its efficiency and reports improvement in forecasting accuracy and execution time as compared to some of the traditional iterative techniques like BPNN (back propagation neural network), ARIMA (autoregressive integrated moving average), LSSVR (least squares support vector regression), ANFIS (adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system), IT2FNN (interval type-2 fuzzy neural network) and RNN (recurrent neural network), etc. However, both ELM and RVFLN without modes decomposition fusion exhibit less execution time at the cost of reduction in prediction accuracy. (C) 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据