4.1 Article

Clinical manifestations and quality of life in hidradenitis suppurativa patients: survey of participants from an internet support group

期刊

ANAIS BRASILEIROS DE DERMATOLOGIA
卷 94, 期 3, 页码 298-303

出版社

SOC BRASILEIRA DERMATOLOGIA
DOI: 10.1590/abd1806-4841.20197687

关键词

Suppurative Hidradenitis; Quality of life; Crowdsourcing; Surveys and questionnaires

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BACKGROUND: Hidradenitis suppurative is a complex and infrequent autoinflammatory disease that impacts on quality of life. Its pathogenesis is not fully understood, which limits the development of curative treatments. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate clinical and quality of life aspects of hidradenitis suppurativa patients from a social group on the Internet. METHODS: A cross-sectional, Internet-based survey study among participants in a discussion group (Facebook) of individuals with hidradenitis suppurativa. Patients were asked to answer a questionnaire about clinical-demographic aspects and quality of life (DLQI-BRA). RESULTS: A total of 390 individuals agreed to participate in the study, 82% of them female, median age (p25-p75), of 31(25-37) years old, disease onset at 15 (13-23) years, family member affected in 20% of cases, overweight (BMI 29 [25-33]) kg/m2 and severe impact on quality of life (DLQI 20 [13-25]). Regarding Hurley's classification, the participants provided information that enabled classification into: I (19%), II (52%) and III (29%). More severe cases were associated with males (OR = 1.69), higher weight (BMI: OR = 1.03) non-white color (OR = 1.43) and higher frequency of other autoinflammatory diseases (OR = 1.37). STUDY LIMITATIONS: Voluntary adherence survey with self-completion of the questionnaire by 390 from about 1600 group members. CONCLUSIONS: Hidradenitis suppurativa patients who participated in a social network group had onset of the disease after puberty, with a predominance in females and overweight people, with great impact on the quality of life.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据