4.5 Article

Itaconic acid fermentation using activated charcoal-treated corn stover hydrolysate and process evaluation based on Aspen plus model

期刊

BIOMASS CONVERSION AND BIOREFINERY
卷 10, 期 2, 页码 463-470

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s13399-019-00423-3

关键词

Itaconic acid fermentation; Acetic acid; Lignocellulose; Dry acid pretreatment; Biodetoxification; Techno-economic analysis

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of China [3181101658]
  2. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2017YFB0309302]
  3. Shanghai Pujiang Program [18PJD013]
  4. Shanghai Sailing Program [19YF1410700]
  5. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2018 M632043]
  6. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities of China [WF1814033]
  7. Open Funding Project of the Key Laboratory of Development and Application of Rural Renewable Energy
  8. University of Houston and the State of Texas

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Itaconic acid production using lignocellulose materials is a promising approach to replace sugar substrates such as glucose that are expensive. However, the complicated detoxification of the hydrolysate is pre-requisite to remove the lignocellulose-derived inhibitors to enable high organic acid fermentation. In this study, the hydrolysate prepared using dry acid pretreated and biodetoxified corn stover was tested for itaconic acid production by the fungal strain Aspergillus terreus M69. Corn stover hydrolysate containing 0.85 g/L acetic acid severely inhibited the organic acid production, but a treatment on the hydrolysate with activated charcoal to remove partial acetic acid helped to produce 33.6 g/L itaconic acid at a yield of 0.56 g/g. Most acetic acid released during enzymatic hydrolysis other than pretreatment was responsible for the inhibition of itaconic acid production. The technol-economic analysis showed that the minimum itaconic acid selling price was $1.647 per kg, which was lower than its market price. This study demonstrates the great potential of itaconic acid production using lignocellulose.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据