4.7 Article

The spatial and temporal evolution of coordinated ecological and socioeconomic development in the provinces along the Silk Road Economic Belt in China

期刊

SUSTAINABLE CITIES AND SOCIETY
卷 47, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.scs.2019.101466

关键词

Ecology; Socioeconomic development; Ecological footprint; Coupling coordination degree

资金

  1. National Social Science Foundation of China Western Project [15XJL009]
  2. Science and Technology Planning Project of Xi'an [2017109SF/RK003-(5)]
  3. Soft Science Research Program of Shaanxi-Joint Project [2018KRLY07]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The ecological and socioeconomic conditions of the provinces along the Silk Road Economic Belt (SREB) in China are quite different. Current research lacks a scientific analysis of the spatial and temporal evolution of the coordinated ecological and socioeconomic development in this region. Based on the ecological footprint and the Comprehensive Development Index (CDI), an evaluation indicator system for coordinated ecological and socioeconomic development was constructed. The weights of the indicators were determined by the entropy method. Using data from 2005 to 2016, the coupling coordination degree model was used to evaluate the coordination level between the ecological and socioeconomic subsystems. The results showed a decreasing trend in the comprehensive evaluation function score of the ecological subsystem. The socioeconomic subsystem scores and coupling coordination degree fluctuated slightly in 2014 and 2015, but they increased in general. The coordinated development improved, and the spatial differences were obvious. Ecological degradation gradually exhibits a restrictive effect on socioeconomic subsystem, further restricting the improvement of the coordinated development. This study can provide a basis for scientific evaluation of the coordinated development level of ecological and socioeconomic conditions, and is conducive to improving the regional cooperation mechanism.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据