4.7 Article

NADPH oxidase 2 inhibitors CPP11G and CPP11H attenuate endothelial cell inflammation & vessel dysfunction and restore mouse hind-limb flow

期刊

REDOX BIOLOGY
卷 22, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.redox.2019.101143

关键词

NADPH oxidase; Reactive oxygen species; Small-molecule inhibitor; Vascular inflammation; Endothelial dysfunction

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health (NIH) [R01HL079207, P01HL103455-01]
  2. AHA [18TPA34170069]
  3. NIH [2R01GM097082]
  4. AHA fellowship [17POST33660330]
  5. Institute for Transfusion Medicine
  6. Hemophilia Center of Western Pennsylvania

向作者/读者索取更多资源

First described as essential to the phagocytic activity of leukocytes, Nox2-derived ROS have emerged as mediators of a range of cellular and tissue responses across species from salubrious to deleterious consequences. Knowledge of their role in inflammation is limited, however. We postulated that TNF alpha-induced endothelial reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation and pro-inflammatory signaling would be ameliorated by targeting Nox2. Herein, we in silico-modelled two first-in-class Nox2 inhibitors developed in our laboratory, explored their cellular mechanism of action and tested their efficacy in in vitro and mouse in vivo models of inflammation. Our data show that these inhibitors (CPP11G and CPP11H) disrupted canonical Nox2 organizing factor, p47(Phox), translocation to Nox2 in the plasma membrane; and abolished ROS production, markedly attenuated stress-responsive MAPK signaling and downstream AP-1 and NF kappa B nuclear translocation in human cells. Consequently, cell adhesion molecule expression and monocyte adherence were significantly inhibited by both inhibitors. In vivo, TNF alpha-induced ROS and inflammation were ameliorated by targeted Nox2 inhibition, which, in turn, improved hind-limb blood flow. These studies identify a proximal role for Nox2 in propagated inflammatory signaling and support therapeutic value of Nox2 inhibitors in inflammatory disease.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据