4.8 Article

A highly stable host for lithium metal anode enabled by Li9Al4-Li3N-AlN structure

期刊

NANO ENERGY
卷 59, 期 -, 页码 110-119

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.nanoen.2019.02.033

关键词

Li metal anode; AlN; Coulombic efficiency; High-rate; High-capacity

资金

  1. Ningbo Natural Science Foundation [2018A610014]
  2. Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China [LQ17E020004]
  3. Ningbo 2025 Project [2018B10060]
  4. National Key R&D Program of China [2018YFB0905400]
  5. Chinese Academy of Sciences Instrument Equipment Function Development Project
  6. Assistant Secretary for Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Office of Vehicle Technologies of the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) through Advanced Battery Materials Research (BMR) program [DE-AC02-05CH11231]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Lithium (Li) metal battery is one of the ideal candidates for the next-generation high-energy-density batteries, but its practical application is still plagued by its large volume change, low coulombic efficiency (CE), and safety issues related to dendrite growth. This work describes a potential solution to these issues using a cross-linked Li9Al4-Li3N-AlN (LLA) structure as a stable host for Li metal anode. The in situ-formed uniform Li9Al4 and Li3N sites on AlN nano-clusters can suppress dendrite growth during the Li plating/stripping process. The intrinsic lithiophilicity of Li9Al4 sites with adjacent Li3N attracts Li+ ions for fast migration and uniform plating/stripping. These unique features lead to dimensional stability of Li@LLA composite anodes (1540 mAh g(-1) and 1600 mAh cm(-3)). High-rate, high-capacity cycling of Li metal anodes has been maintained with a CE of similar to 98% in carbonate-based electrolytes. High capacity retention of 90.1% is achieved for a Li@LLA parallel to LiNi0.8Co0.1Mn0.1O2 full cell at the 200th cycle. Therefore, the LLA structure with a simple fabrication process could be a promising candidate to enhance the safety of next-generation Li metal batteries.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据