4.3 Article

Enterovirga rhinocerotis gen. nov., sp nov., isolated from Rhinoceros unicornis faeces

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10482-016-0823-1

关键词

Enterovirga rhinocerotis gen. nov sp nov.; 16S rRNA gene; Faeces

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31270001, 31460005, 81573327]
  2. Program for New Century Excellent Talents in University
  3. Yunnan Provincial Society Development Project [2014BC006]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A novel strain, YIM 100770(T), was isolated from Rhinoceros unicornis faeces collected from Yunnan Wild Animal Park, China. The taxonomic status was determined based on the physiological, biochemical and phylogenetic characteristics. Strain YIM 100770(T) was observed to be rod-shaped, nonmotile, Gram-stain negative and aerobic. The G+C content of the genomic DNA was determined to be 68.5 mol%. The cells of strain YIM 100770(T) contain ubiquinone Q-10 as the respiratory quinone. The major fatty acids (>1%) were identified as Summed feature 8 (C-18:1 omega 7c and/or C-18:1 omega 6c; 78.1%), Summed feature 4 (iso-C1(7:1)-I and/or anteiso-C-17:1-B; 12.9%), C-19:0 cyclo omega 8c (2.8%), C-16:0 (2.2%) and C-18:0 (2.2%). Comparison of 16S rRNA gene sequences revealed the strain show high similarities with the members of the genera Psychroglaciecola (94.5%), Methylobacterium (90.5-94.1%) and Microvirga (92.0-93.3%) in the family Methylobacteriaceae. In addition, the strain also showed high similarities with the members of the genera Chelatococcus (93.7-94.0%) and Pseudochelatococcus (93.1-93.7%) in the family Beijerinckiacea, and the genus Bosea (93.1-93.8%) in the family Bradyrhizobiaceae. The phylogenetic analysis, combined with the chemical characteristics, suggest that the strain represents a novel genus in the order Rhizobiales of the class Alphaproteobacteria, for which the name Enterovirga rhinocerotis gen. nov., sp. nov. is proposed. The type strain of E. rhinocerotis is YIM 100770(T) (=DSM 25903(T) = CCTCC AB 2012048(T)).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据