4.7 Article

Mycophenolic acid potently inhibits rotavirus infection with a high barrier to resistance development

期刊

ANTIVIRAL RESEARCH
卷 133, 期 -, 页码 41-49

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.antiviral.2016.07.017

关键词

Rotavirus; Immunosuppressants; Mycophenolic acid; Intestinal organoids

资金

  1. Dutch Digestive Foundation (MLDS) [CDG 1304]
  2. Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO/ZonMw) [916-13-032]
  3. Erasmus MC Mrace grant [360525]
  4. China Scholarship Council [201307720045, 201207720007, 201406180072, 201306300027, 201206150075, 201303250056]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Rotavirus infection has emerged as an important cause of complications in organ transplantation recipients. Immunosuppressants used to prevent alloreactivity can also interfere with virus infection, but the direct effects of the specific type of immunosuppressants on rotavirus infection are still unclear. Here we profiled the effects of different immunosuppressants on rotavirus using a 2D culture model of Caco2 human intestinal cell line and a 3D model of human primary intestinal organoids inoculated with laboratory and patient-derived rotavirus strains. We found that the responsiveness of rotavirus to Cyclosporine A treatment was moderate and strictly regulated in an opposite direction by its cellular targets cyclophilin A and B. Treatment with mycophenolic acid (MPA) resulted in a 99% inhibition of viral RNA production at the clinically relevant concentration (10 mu g/ml) in Caco2 cells. This effect was further confirmed in organoids. Importantly, continuous treatment with MPA for 30 passages did not attenuate its antiviral potency, indicating a high barrier to drug resistance development. Mechanistically, the antiviral effects of MPA act via inhibiting the IMPDH enzyme and resulting in guanosine nucleotide depletion. Thus for transplantation patients at risk for rotavirus infection, the choice of MPA as an immunosuppressive agent appears rational. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据