4.7 Article

Clonal Dissemination of Pseudomonas aeruginosa Sequence Type 235 Isolates Carrying blaIMP-6 and Emergence of blaGES-24 and blaIMP-10 on Novel Genomic Islands PAGI-15 and-16 in South Korea

期刊

ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY
卷 60, 期 12, 页码 7216-7223

出版社

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/AAC.01601-16

关键词

-

资金

  1. Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [2015E4400200]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A total of 431 Pseudomonas aeruginosa clinical isolates were collected from 29 general hospitals in South Korea in 2015. Antimicrobial susceptibility was tested by the disk diffusion method, and MICs of carbapenems were determined by the agar dilution method. Carbapenemase genes were amplified by PCR and sequenced, and the structures of class 1 integrons surrounding the carbapenemase gene cassettes were analyzed by PCR mapping. Multilocus sequence typing (MLST) and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) were performed for strain typing. Whole-genome sequencing was carried out to analyze P. aeruginosa genomic islands (PAGIs) carrying the bla(IMP-6), bla(IMP-10), and bla(GES-24) genes. The rates of carbapenem-nonsusceptible and carbapenemase- producing P. aeruginosa isolates were 34.3% (148/431) and 9.5% (41/431), respectively. IMP-6 was the most prevalent carbapenemase type, followed by VIM-2, IMP-10, and GES-24. All carbapenemase genes were located on class 1 integrons of 6 different types on the chromosome. All isolates harboring carbapenemase genes exhibited genetic relatedness by PFGE (similarity > 80%); moreover, all isolates were identified as sequence type 235 (ST235), with the exception of two ST244 isolates by MLST. The blaIMP-6, blaIMP-10, and blaGES-24 genes were found to be located on two novel PAGIs, designated PAGI-15 and PAGI-16. Our data support the clonal spread of an IMP-6-producing P. aeruginosa ST235 strain, and the emergence of IMP-10 and GES-24 demonstrates the diversification of carbapenemases in P. aeruginosa in Korea.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据