4.5 Article

Kinetic analysis of thermal and catalytic degradation of polymers found in waste electric and electronic equipment

期刊

THERMOCHIMICA ACTA
卷 675, 期 -, 页码 69-76

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.tca.2019.03.001

关键词

Thermal degradation; Kinetics; WEEE; Random scission model; Isoconversional methods

资金

  1. Deanship of Scientific Research (DSR) at King Fand University of Petroleum & Minerals (KFUPM), Dhahran, Saudi Arabia [IN161007]
  2. Department of Chemistry of Aristotle University of Thessaloniki

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Thermo-chemical recycling of plastics originating in waste electric and electronic equipment (WEEE) is always a challenge due to the production of secondary value-added compounds or energy from obsolete materials. The dominant step for a suitable design of any pyrolysis reactor is to understand the kinetics of thermal degradation of the input materials. Therefore, in this investigation thermal and catalytic degradation of several polymers found in WEEE, such as High-Impact Polystyrene (HIPS), polypropylene (PP), and polycarbonate (PC) as well as PC/MgO and PP/MCM-41 was investigated. The random scission model developed by Sanchez-Jimenez et al., with L = 2 was used for the simulation of the degradation of all systems at several heating rates. The activation energy was estimated using an isoconversional approach. A system of differential equations were set and solved using as an adjustable parameter only the pre-exponential factor. It was found that using the same set of parameters, thermogravimetric data at different heating rates can be simulated very well in the range 0.3 < alpha < 0.9. This observation verified the hypothesis that at this region of degradation the dominant mechanism is that of random scission. Better simulation was obtained at higher heating rates. Using catalysts of variable acidity, it was verified that the activation energy of the catalytic was decreased compared to the conventional thermal degradation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据