4.5 Article

Enhancement the anticorrosive resistance of epoxy coatings by incorporation of CeO2 @ polyaniline @ 2-mercaptobenzotiazole nanocomposite

期刊

SYNTHETIC METALS
卷 250, 期 -, 页码 63-72

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.synthmet.2019.03.001

关键词

Mild steel; Ceria nanoparticle; Epoxy; MBT; Layer by layer; EIS

资金

  1. Iranian National Committee of Nanotechnology in Ministry of Science, Research and Technology
  2. Office of Vice Chancellor in Charge of Research of the University of Tabriz

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To improve the corrosion protection properties of epoxy coatings, different weight percentages of CeO2/polyaniline/2-mercaptobenzothiazole nanocomposite with core-double shell structure (CeO2@PANI@MBT) were embedded in epoxy matrix. The CeO2@PANI@MBT organic/inorganic hybrid nanocomposite was successfully synthesized through layer by layer method during two steps. By the Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), Raman spectroscopy, thermogravimetric analysis (TGA), Dynamic light scattering (DLS) and Zeta potential techniques, the formation of CeO2@PANI@MBT nanocomposite has been confirmed. The anticorrosive performance of CeO2@PANI@MBT nanocomposite into epoxy coating (EP/CeO2@PANI@MBT) was investigated using electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), salt spray and pull off analysis. Compared to EP/CeO2 and pure EP, the as-prepared EP/CeO2@PANI@MBT coatings exhibited superior protective properties with high impedance modules (vertical bar Z vertical bar >= 10(9)) at low frequency (0.01 Hz), minimum agglomeration and low permeability to water penetration. The highest coating resistance (R-coat) was obtained in coating comprising of 1 wt% CeO2@PANI@MBT (1.69 x 10(7) Omega cm(2)), which had the lowest coating capacitance (1.30 x 10(-11) Fcm(-7)). The water uptake of EP/CeO2@PANI@MBT 1 wt% was 5.25 and 2.83 times lower than those considered for EP and EP/CeO2 coatings after 200 h exposure to saline electrolyte at 65 degrees C, respectively.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据