4.8 Article

α-Fe2O3 Nanoparticles Decorated C@MoS2 Nanosheet Arrays with Expanded Spacing of (002) Plane for Ultrafast and High Li/Na-Ion Storage

期刊

SMALL
卷 15, 期 21, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/smll.201901083

关键词

electrochemistry; Fe2O3 nanoparticles; graphite C; interlayer-expanded MoS2; Li+/Na+ storage

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of China [11774216]
  2. Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality [16ZR1412100]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41430644, 21671131]
  4. Program for Changjiang Scholars and Innovative Research Team in University [IRT_17R71]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

MoS2 nanosheets as a promising 2D nanomaterial have extensive applications in energy storage and conversion, but their electrochemical performance is still unsatisfactory as an anode for efficient Li+/Na+ storage. In this work, the design and synthesis of vertically grown MoS2 nanosheet arrays, decorated with graphite carbon and Fe2O3 nanoparticles, on flexible carbon fiber cloth (denoted as Fe2O3@C@MoS2/CFC) is reported. When evaluated as an anode for lithium-ion batteries, the Fe2O3@C@MoS2/CFC electrode manifests an outstanding electrochemical performance with a high discharge capacity of 1541.2 mAh g(-1) at 0.1 A g(-1) and a good capacity retention of 80.1% at 1.0 A g(-1) after 500 cycles. As for sodium-ion batteries, it retains a high reversible capacity of 889.4 mAh g(-1) at 0.5 A g(-1) over 200 cycles. The superior electrochemical performance mainly results from the unique 3D ordered Fe2O3@C@MoS2 array-type nanostructures and the synergistic effect between the C@MoS2 nanosheet arrays and Fe2O3 nanoparticles. The Fe2O3 nanoparticles act as spacers to steady the structure, and the graphite carbon could be incorporated into MoS2 nanosheets to improve the conductivity of the whole electrode and strengthen the integration of MoS2 nanosheets and CFC by the adhesive role, together ensuring high conductivity and mechanical stability.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据